USB Bridge Solutions, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation
| USB Bridge Solutions, LLC |
| Western Digital Corporation |
| 3:2022cv04487 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by USB Bridge Solutions, LLC.. (Kheyfits, Dmitry) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Western Digital Corporation. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2022) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/31/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/7/2022 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/17/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2022) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Kheyfits, Dmitry) (Filed on 8/3/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by USB Bridge Solutions, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Intelleq Holdings, LLC for USB Bridge Solutions, LLC. (Kheyfits, Dmitry) (Filed on 8/3/2022) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding a patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Kheyfits, Dmitry) (Filed on 8/3/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement; Demand for Jury Trial against Western Digital Corporation, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17408121). Filed by USB Bridge Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kheyfits, Dmitry) (Filed on 8/3/2022) Modified on 8/3/2022 (tn, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USB Bridge Solutions, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USB Bridge Solutions, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Dmitry Kheyfits |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Western Digital Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
