Riley v. Astra Space Inc. et al
| Christine E. Riley |
| Astra Space, Inc., Holicity Inc., Chris C. Kemp, Kelyn Brannon and Steven Ednie |
| Qingping Deng |
| 3:2022cv08876 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer: Granting #20 Motion for Pro Hac Vice, Tamar A. Weinrib. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2022)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17825509.) filed by Qingping Deng, Christine E. Riley. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Weinrib, Tamar) (Filed on 12/15/2022) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Pafiti (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 12/15/2022) |
| Filing 18 Case transferred in from District of New York Eastern; Case Number 1:22-cv-01591. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Case transferred to Northern District of California. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent via CM/ECF. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00737-NM-MMH, 1:22-cv-01591-NM-MMH(TL) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Nina Morrison and Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry for all further proceedings. Judge Pamela K. Chen, Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon no longer assigned to case as related to case 22-cv-737. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/7/2022. (SR)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting 37 : The parties' Stipulation and Proposed Order to Transfer Venue and Amend Schedule is So Ordered. See attached. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 11/30/2022. (MY) (Documents numbers reference filings on lead case, 22-cv-737) (TL) (Entered: 12/07/2022)
|
| Cases associated. (TL) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER re 28: The unopposed 29 Stipulation on Consolidation and Appointment of Lead Plaintiff 28 is so ordered. Accordingly, the related motions [10, 13, 16, 17, and 21] are denied as moot. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 10/17/2022. (MY) (Document numbers reflect filings in lead case, 1:22-cv-737) (TL) (Entered: 12/07/2022)
|
|
ORDER: The Court grants the #15 Motion to Vacate the Scheduling Order issued on 8/15/2022. All deadlines in this case are adjourned sine die until there is a ruling on the motion to consolidate in Artery v. Astra Space, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-00737. The Parties shall inform this Court of the resolution of that consolidation motion within 2 business days of a ruling by the Honorable Judge Diane Gujarati. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/18/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
|
| Filing 15 Letter MOTION to Vacate Scheduling Order,,,, from August 15, 2022 by Christine E. Riley. (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
|
ORDER: Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(A), Plaintiff Christine E. Riley had 20 days after the filing of the #1 Complaint to "publish[], in a widely circulated national business oriented-publication or wire service, a notice advising members of the purported plaintiff class" of this action and that any member of the purported class had 60 days thereafter to move this Court to serve as lead plaintiff. By 8/19/2022, Plaintiff Riley is hereby ordered to file on ECF proof of such publication within 20 days of the date the Complaint was filed. Further, the Court notes that on 5/10/2022, attorney Tamar A. Weinreb filed a notice of appearance on behalf of "Lead Plaintiff Movant Qingping Deng and Plaintiff Christine E. Riley." (See Dkt. #13 .) Yet neither Qingping Deng nor Christine Riley have yet moved to be appointed lead plaintiff. In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3), the Court hereby orders that any member of the purported class for this action requesting to be appointed lead plaintiff file a motion for appointment of lead plaintiff by 9/15/2022. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/15/2022. (Kim, Eliot) VACATED pursuant to Order of Judge Pamela K. Chen dated 8/18/2022. This entry has been modified on 8/18/2022 to indicate that the order has been vacated. (Gonzalez, Fida)
|
|
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the letter at #14 , discovery is stayed and the upcoming Telephonic Initial Conference scheduled for 8/16/2022 is adjourned sine die. Counsel are reminded that should they identify a scheduling concern, they should promptly contact the Court. The letter at #14 does not provide any explanation as to why counsel waited until two weeks before the upcoming conference to raise an issue based on a stipulation submitted and signed four months ago, after the Scheduling Order at #5 was entered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 8/2/2022. (Scully, Nicole)
|
| Filing 14 Letter MOTION to Vacate #5 Scheduling Order,,,, Filed by Astra Space Inc., Kelyn Brannon, Steven Ednie, Chris C. Kemp. (Rotenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Tamar A Weinrib on behalf of Christine E. Riley, Qingping Deng (aty to be noticed) (Weinrib, Tamar) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Astra Space Inc. (Rotenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Rotenberg on behalf of Astra Space Inc., Kelyn Brannon, Steven Ednie, Chris C. Kemp (aty to be noticed) (Rotenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce G. Vanyo on behalf of Astra Space Inc., Kelyn Brannon, Steven Ednie, Chris C. Kemp (aty to be noticed) (Vanyo, Bruce) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline Sabatier on behalf of Astra Space Inc., Kelyn Brannon, Steven Ednie, Chris C. Kemp (aty to be noticed) (Sabatier, Caroline) |
|
ORDER: The #6 Stipulation is So Ordered. Counsel for Defendants is directed to enter an appearance in this matter. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 4/1/2022. (Sharon, William)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Henry Przybylowski on behalf of Christine E. Riley (aty to be noticed) (Przybylowski, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Alexander Hood on behalf of Christine E. Riley (aty to be noticed) (Hood, J. Alexander) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION And Proposed Order Regarding Defendants' Acceptance Of Service And Response To The Complaint, Filed by Astra Space Inc., Kelyn Brannon, Steven Ednie, Chris C. Kemp (Rotenberg, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 8/16/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 8/2/2022. In the event that any Defendant(s) has not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiff(s) must also mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full docket to the last known mailing address(es) for such Defendant(s) and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. To the extent the parties believe that discovery should be stayed under any relevant statutory provision, they should be prepared to discuss their position with the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/24/2022. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Main Document 4 replaced on 3/23/2022) (Bowens, Priscilla). |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Astra Space Inc. f/k/a Holicity Inc., Kelyn Brannon, Steven Ednie, Chris C. Kemp filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15401609 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Christine E. Riley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
