Lewis v. Newsom et al
Daronta T. Lewis |
Governor Gavin Newsom, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Connie Gibson, C. Schyler and E. Balora |
3:2023cv04394 |
August 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC GRC |
Araceli Martinez-Olguin |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION Court to Grant IFP and Grant Emergency Screening, Injunction Relief filed by Daronta T. Lewis. Responses due by 10/3/2023. Replies due by 10/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2023) |
Filing 3 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Daronta T. Lewis. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2023) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Daronta T. Lewis, CDCR # BH5097.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Connie Gibson, Gavin Newsom. Filed byDaronta T. Lewis. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.