Powell v. Monsanto Company
| Jake Powell |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2024cv06134 |
| August 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Case Transferred in from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis); Case Number 4:24-cv-00998-NCC. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED re MDL 2741: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis), 4:24-cv-00998-NCC, Powell v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-06134-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-474) cc: JPMDL (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2024) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: Northern District of California. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. Signed by Marcella R. Lockert on 8/23/24. (JWD)
|
| Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-474) regarding MDL 2741 by Clerk of the Panel. Signed by Marcella R. Lockert on 8/23/24. (JWD) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jake Powell. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Haynie, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #6 Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff Jake Powell. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action, which party filed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, but failed to properly complete the Court adopted form with diversity information. Individual parties must list their name and state of citizenship (not residence or domicile) in Section 2 of the form. An amended Disclosure Statement must be filed immediately. (CBL) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jake Powell. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Haynie, David) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Jake Powell - SECOND NOTICE. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Jake Powell. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Jake Powell Process Server: Notice of Intent to Use Process Server (Haynie, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Monsanto Company with receipt number AMOEDC-10723071, in the amount of $405.00, Jury Demand, filed by Jake Powell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Original Filing Form)(Haynie, David) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney David Haynie. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Powell v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jake Powell | |
| Represented By: | David Matthew Haynie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
