Rutman et al v. Bayer Cropscience, LLC
Jeanne Rutman and Robert Rutman |
Bayer Cropscience, LLC, Monsanto and JOHN DOES 1-50 |
3:2024cv06751 |
September 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-00664. Case file, copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Modified on 9/26/2024 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Southern District of Ohio, 1:23-cv-00664, Rutman et al v. Bayer Cropscience, LLC, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-06751-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 475 cc: JPMDL (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2024) |
Filing 17 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-475): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on MDL, this action is transferred to the Northern District of California. Signed by the Acting Clerk of the Panel on 8/27/2024; certified by the Clerk's Office from CAND on 8/27/2024. (er) |
Filing 16 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-475): This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Signed by the Acting Clerk of the Panel on 8/27/2024. (er) |
Case transferred to District of California Northern. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (er) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Set Aside Default by Defendant Bayer Cropscience, LLC. (Lewis, John) |
Filing 14 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Plaintiffs Jeanne Rutman, Robert Rutman re #13 Application to Clerk for entry of default and #12 First MOTION for Default Judgment. (kev) |
Filing 13 First Application to Clerk for entry of default against Bayer CropScience LLC . (Brankamp, Jared) |
Filing 12 First MOTION for Default Judgment against Bayer CropScience, LLC by Plaintiff Jeanne Rutman. (Brankamp, Jared) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Bayer Cropscience, LLC. Bayer Cropscience, LLC served on 7/25/2024, answer due 8/15/2024. (kh) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Mailing: Certified mailing of summons and complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bjc) |
Filing 9 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. and Am. Complaint (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (Brankamp, Jared) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Bayer Cropscience, LLC. (bjc) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Brankamp, Jared) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bayer Cropscience, LLC. (eh) |
Notice of Correction: Please disregard [FORMER DOC. 4] - Incorrect pdf attached. (eh) |
Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Brankamp, Jared) |
Filing 4 [FORMER DOC. 4 - PLEASE DISREGARD. INCORRECT PDF ATTACHED.] REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Brankamp, Jared) Modified docket text and document security on 1/30/2024 (eh). |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Jeanne Rutman. (Brankamp, Jared) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiffs Jeanne Rutman, Robert Rutman re #1 Complaint (Brankamp, Jared) Modified docket text on 10/17/2023 (md). |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (md) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9646395), filed by Jeanne Rutman. (Brankamp, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.