Sivak v. Schroeder et al
Petitioner: Lacey Sivak
Respondent: Judge Mary M. Schroeder, Judge Milan D. Smith and Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz
Case Number: 3:2025cv00472
Filed: January 13, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: PSLC GRC
Referring Judge: Araceli Martinez-Olguin
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2025 Filing 7 USCA for the Ninth Circuit Case Number 25-1631 For dkt. #5 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals of a Clearly Illegal Ruling filed by Lacey Sivak. (kxo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2025)
March 4, 2025 Filing 6 Notice of Appeal of the Clerks Office Return of Petitioners Attempted Resubmission of His Petition to Compel by Lacey Sivak re #5 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2025)
February 20, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals of a Clearly Illegal Ruling filed by Lacey Sivak. Appeal of Judgment, #3 , Order Dismissing Case, #2 (Appeal fee FEE NOT PAID.) (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2025)
February 10, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based on Imminent Danger filed by Lacey Sivak. (kxo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2025)
January 29, 2025 Filing 3 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 1/29/2025. (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING MULTIPLE CASES WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 1/29/2025. (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 13, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION to Compel Three Officers of the United States to Perform Their Duty Under 28 USC 1361 of a Clearly Erroneous Ruling, against Andrew D. Hurwitz, Mary M. Schroeder, Milan D. Smith () Filed by Lacey Sivak. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2025)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sivak v. Schroeder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Judge Mary M. Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Judge Milan D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lacey Sivak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?