Smith v. Shamrock Condominium (HOA) et al
Samuel Smith |
Shamrock Condominium (HOA) and B&D Towing Company |
3:2025cv01002 |
January 31, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Charles R Breyer |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 4/25/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/2/2025 08:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2025) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Samuel Smith. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2025) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against B&D Towing Company, Shamrock Condominium (HOA). Filed by Samuel Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2025) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.