Rodriguez v. Warden, C.S.A.T.F.

Case Number: 4:2004cv02233
Filed: June 7, 2004
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 25, 2015 103 Opinion or Order of the Court Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 101 Motion to Excuse Procedural Default and Issuing Certificate of Appealability.(pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2015)
January 13, 2014 96 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule Following Remand. Motion due by 2/10/2014. Response due by 3/10/2014. Reply due by 3/24/2014. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/13/2014. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2014)
February 24, 2012 85 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 2/24/12. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
October 11, 2011 81 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/11/11. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)
June 13, 2011 73 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 6/13/11. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2011)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Warden, C.S.A.T.F.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?