Daniel v. Ayers

Petitioner: Demetrius Daniel
Respondent: Robert L. Ayers, Jr
Case Number: 4:2007cv01972
Filed: April 6, 2007
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 21, 2009 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE without Prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 12/17/09. All pending motions are TERMINATED. ***Civil Case Terminated (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009) Modified on 12/22/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/12/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
September 4, 2008 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/2/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2008)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel v. Ayers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Demetrius Daniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert L. Ayers, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?