Rosequist v. Michael Taylor Designs, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ivy Rosequist
Defendant: Michael Taylor Designs, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2008cv01588
Filed: March 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Trademark Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/4/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2010)
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER SCHEDULING FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: To 03/16/10 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, on 3/1/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010) Modified on 3/2/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
February 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AT DEPOSITION AND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 02/01/10. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010) Modified on 2/2/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 59 Stipulation for Amended Pretrial Preparation Order Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 12/16/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2009) Modified on 12/17/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
October 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 56 STIPULATION AND ORDER: That Plaintiff William Giffen's Amended Complaint shall be filed by 10/22/09. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 10/16/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2009) Modified on 10/22/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
August 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 STIPULATION AND CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/18/2009. Jury Trial set for 6/21/2010 08:30 AM. Motions due by 4/13/2010. Pretrial Conference set for 6/1/2010 01:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/25/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2009) Modified on 8/27/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
May 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the Settlement Conference shall commence on 06/26/09 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, on 5/21/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2009) Modified on 5/22/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: The Settlement Conference is set for 05/29/09 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, on 4/6/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009) Modified on 4/7/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG withdrawing 13 Motion to Substitute Party. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosequist v. Michael Taylor Designs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ivy Rosequist
Represented By: George M. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Taylor Designs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?