Tarantinos, Inc. et al v. Conseco Life Insurance Company et al
Tarantinos, Inc. and Macmarin, Inc. |
Conseco Life Insurance Company and John S. Leipsic, Inc. |
4:2009cv01974 |
May 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Saundra Brown Armstrong |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER: Extending Deadline to Finalize Settlement for an additional (30) thirty-days. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 11/30/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2009) Modified on 12/3/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FINALIZE SETTLMENT: That the parties are EXTENDED and additional (30) thirty-days until 12/01/09 to request reinstatement. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 10/26/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2009) Modified on 10/28/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 35 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. All scheduled dates are VACATED. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 9/17/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2009) Modified on 9/18/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER re Extension of Time for Defendant John S. Leipsic, Inc. to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 6/30/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009) Modified on 7/1/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.