Luxford et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
| Teresa Ann Luxford and Carlos H Perez |
| Resurgent Capital Services, LP, Alegis Group, LLC and LVNV Funding LLC |
| 5:2009cv02809 |
| June 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER REGARDING AWARD OF DAMAGES AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE FEES, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS re 60 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Teresa Ann Luxford, Carlos H Perez, 63 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 60 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs, 62 MOTION for an Award of Damages and Incentive Award to Individual Plaintiffs , 61 Errata, filed by LVNV Funding LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, Teresa Ann Luxford, Alegis G roup, LLC, Carlos H Perez, 62 MOTION for an Award of Damages and Incentive Award to Individual Plaintiffs filed by Teresa Ann Luxford, Carlos H Perez. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/10/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET FINAL APPROVAL HEARING PURSUANT TO CASE REASSIGNMENT re 55 Stipulation filed by LVNV Funding LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, Alegis Group, LLC. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/8/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (granting 38 , 45 ). Final Approval Hearing set for 8/26/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/22/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2011)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 46 REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CONTINUED HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/19/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2011)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/6/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER APPROVING 35 CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2010 is CONTINUED to 1/28/2011 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/10/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 31 . Case Management Conference set for 6/25/2010 is continued to 8/20/2010 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/23/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE re 28 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/3/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2010)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING 23 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 4/2/2010 is CONTINUED to 6/25/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/24/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/2/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 15 , Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/16/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
