Muhammad v. People of California et al
| James Karim Muhammad |
| People of California, Jeffrey Stark, Bob Conner and Cynthia Conejo |
| 4:2010cv01449 |
| April 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 96 Ex Parte Application (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 73 Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Bob Conner. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 09/23/11 (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011) Modified on 9/28/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 73 MOTION for Default Judgment as to. Motion Hearing set for 9/27/2011 01:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 65 Motion to Appoint Counsel (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 36 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 38 Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings; denying 45 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 22 Motion to Amend/Correct ; (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
