In the Matter of the Referral of Gregory M. Haynes to the Standing Committee of the United States District Court
Miscellaneous: Standing Committee on Professional Conduct
Case Number: 4:2010cv04642
Filed: October 14, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER OF DISBARMENT (reposted to include EJD signature). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila for the Panel on 2/11/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 137 RULING ON APPLICABLE LOCAL RULE; ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE. Haynes' motions filed 4/5/2013 will be deemed his Opening Brief. The Standing Committee shall file its Responsive Brief on or before 9/10/2013. Haynes shall file his Reply Brief, if any, on or before 9/20/2013. The parties will thereafter be notified of a hearing date and time. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila for the Panel on 8/21/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)
June 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 134 BRIEFING ORDER. On or before 6/28/2013, Appellant and Respondent shall file simultaneous briefs, not to exceed five pages. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila, for the panel, on 6/6/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2013)
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER REFERRING DISCIPLINARY MATTER TO THREE-JUDGE PANEL. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/19/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2013)
April 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER re 119 Letter filed by Gregory M. Haynes; ORDER STAYING ORDER OF DISBARMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/1/2013. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)
March 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER OF DISBARMENT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/22/2013. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
September 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/21/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/18/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/5/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER re 66 Affidavit filed by Gregory M. Haynes; ORDER Denying Rule 56(d) Motion; ORDER Specifying Procedures and Issues for Determination. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 7/6/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)
March 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER Unsealing Case. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 3/1/12. (vlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of the Referral of Gregory M. Haynes to the Standing Committee of the United States District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: Standing Committee on Professional Conduct
Represented By: E. Jeffrey Banchero
Represented By: Diane M. Doolittle
Represented By: David H. Fry
Represented By: Forrest Arthur Hainline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?