Center for Biological Diversity v. Salazar et al
| Center for Biological Diversity |
| Ken Salazar and United States Fish and Wildlife Service |
| 4:2010cv04861 |
| October 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sacramento |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER re 19 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference, filed by Ken Salazar, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Center for Biological Diversity. Initial Case Management Conference previously scheduled for 3/9/2011 has been CONTINUED to 4/20/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/1/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER re 16 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at the Case Management Conference filed by Ken Salazar, United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/18/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER GRANTING 10 REQUEST TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference previously scheduled for 2/2/2011 has been CONTINUED to 3/9/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/23/2010. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
