Iyogi Holding PVT Ltd. v. Secure Remote Support, Inc et al
| Iyogi Holding PVT Ltd. |
| Joseph Ward Clark, Holly J Slocum and Secure Remote Support, Inc |
| 4:2011cv00592 |
| February 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/16/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE 35 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/15/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
47
Order Continuing Hearing; Requesting Further Briefing Re: Personal Jurisdiction and Venue. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on September 9, 2011. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING re 41 Letter filed by Iyogi Holding PVT Ltd., for Scott Ferguson to appear by phone on 9/16/11 at 9:30 AM for hearing on the Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/21/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE for Report and Recommendation re 35 MOTION for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/25/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
