Perrault v. Virga
Petitioner: Michael Perrault
Respondent: Tim V. Virga
Case Number: 5:2011cv03298
Filed: July 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/4/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014)
November 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer [AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT] (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perrault v. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tim V. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Perrault
Represented By: Robert Joseph Beles
Represented By: Paul Gilruth McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?