Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-5698
Digital Sin, Inc. |
Does 1-5698 |
4:2011cv04397 |
September 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Los Angeles |
Laurel Beeler |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING 6 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Enlargement of Time to Serve Defendants. Plaintiff must name and serve Doe 1 by February 4, 2012. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/4/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING IN PART 3 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application. The court grants Plaintiff's motion with respect to Doe No. 1, and it severs Does 2-5698 and dismisses Plaintiff's claims against them. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/4/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Digital Sin, Inc... (Siegel, Ira) (Filed on 9/12/2011) |
Filing 9 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011) |
Filing 8 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2012. Case Management Conference set for 3/8/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) |
Filing 7 Proposed Order re 6 Ex Parte Application by Digital Sin, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6 Ex Parte Application for Enlargement of Time to Serve Defendants filed by Digital Sin, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 5 Proposed Order re 3 Ex Parte Application by Digital Sin, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Declaration of Jon Nicolini in Support of 3 Ex Parte Application filed by Digital Sin, Inc. (Related document(s) 3 ) (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 3 Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Limited Discovery Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Digital Sin, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Digital Sin, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Does 1-5698 (Filing fee $350, receipt number 34611064244). Filed by Digital Sin, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2011: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-5698 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Digital Sin, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ira M. Siegel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Does 1-5698 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.