Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund et al v. Bridges Tire and Wheel Service, Inc.
| Douglas Cornford, James V. Canterbury, Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, James H. Beno, Bill Brunelli, Stephen J. Mack, Chris Christophersen, Don Crosatto, Mark Hollibush and Jon Roselle |
| Bridges Tire and Wheel Service, Inc. |
| 4:2011cv04538 |
| September 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1451 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER RE DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND CONTINUED JUDGMENT DEBTOR EXAM: Re 19 Proposed Order, filed by Stephen J. Mack, Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, Chris Christophersen, James H. Beno, Jon Roselle, Douglas Cornford, James V. Canterbury, Bill Brunelli, Don Crosatto, Mark Hollibush. Judgment Debtor Exam set for 9/30/2014 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/31/2014. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2014)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER re 4 Stipulation, filed by Stephen J. Mack, Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, Chris Christophersen, James H. Beno, Bridges Tire and Wheel Service, Inc., Jon Roselle, Douglas Cornford, James V. Canterbury, Bill Brunelli, Don Crosatto, Mark Hollibush. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/7/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
