Moore v. Stepp et al
| Merrick Jose Moore |
| L. Stepp, J. Deanzo, C. Gill, T. Krenke, S. Hatton, B. Hendricks, A. Hedgpeth, J. Crabtree, Spaulding, Jinson, Franco, A. Meyer, Brown and Ramos |
| 4:2011cv05395 |
| November 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Kings |
| PSLC ECK |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, MERRICK JOSE MOORE; ORDER re 135 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Merrick Jose Moore. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/24/16. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER re Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/28/2015. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2015)
|
|
Filing
114
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 12/2/14. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
111
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas on 9/30/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/21/2013 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/10/13. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
