United States of America v. $127,000 in United States Currency
United States of America |
$127,000 in United States Currency |
Angelo F. Salazar |
4:2011cv06605 |
December 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Laurel Beeler |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER DENYING 15 Claimant's Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/17/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012) |
Filing 38 ORDER RE: OVER SIZE BRIEF OF THE UNITED STATES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/1/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012) |
Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING 22 the Government's Administrative Motion for Extension of Deadlines. The United States may file any opposition to Claimants summary judgment and/or cross-motion for summary judgment by April 26, 2012. Claimant may file any reply in support of his motion for summary judgment or opposition to the Governments cross-motion for summary judgment by May 24, 2012. The Government may file any reply in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment by June 7, 2012. The hearing on the motion(s) will take place on June 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 04/19/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.