Permito v. Wells Fargo, N.A.
Maria Elena Permito |
Wells Fargo, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
4:2012cv00545 |
February 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Mateo |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/28/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012) |
Filing 29 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS.The 7/10/2012 Hearing date is VACATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/14/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2012) |
Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 19 Motion to Dismiss with leave to Amend; finding as moot 24 Motion to Appear by Telephone for motion hearing. The 4/24/12 at 2:00pm hearing date is vacated. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2012) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING Compliance Hearing re this Show Cause Order is set for Friday, 2/10/2012 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 2/9/2012 by 4:00pm.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/8/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.