Smith v. Payne et al
| Gwendolyn Smith |
| Paul Payne and Santa Rosa Press Democrat |
| 4:2012cv01732 |
| April 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sonoma |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28:1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 58 Motion for Attorney Fees.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
54
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 34 Motion to Strike and Dismissing Complaint.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER re 26 Letter filed by Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/21/2012. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Setting Case Management Conference after reassignment. Case Management Statement due by 9/5/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/12/2012 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/13/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Withdrawing 11 Order for Reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/12/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER for Reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/6/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/6/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
