Ruff et al v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
| Bridgette Ruff and Leeing Haworth |
| Diversified Collection Services, Inc. |
| 4:2012cv02781 |
| May 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/19/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
29
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER for additional information (Plaintiffs by 12/13/12 at noon and both parties by 12/17/12 at 9:30 a.m.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/13/2012. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Plaintiff's failure to submit settlement conference statement and instructions to parties to correct deficiencies. Court orders meet and confer by 10 a.m. on 12/13/2012, e-filed statement by Plaintiff showing cause by 12 noon on 12/13/12, emailed settlement papers to be submitted by Plaintiff by noon on 12/13/12, and supplemental submission by Defendant by 2 p.m. on 12/13/12. Signed by Judge Beeler on 12/12/12. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 12/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process. Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/18/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
