Hansen v. City of San Francisco et al
| Gared Hansen |
| City of San Francisco, Gregory P. Suhr and George Gascon |
| 4:2012cv04210 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Jon S. Tigar, granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. CORRECTION OF DOCKET #56. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014)
|
|
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES filed by City of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment filed by City of San Francisco, Denying at Moot 47 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Gared Hansen. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 6, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY PHONE. THE COURT INITIATES ALL CONFERENCE CALLS. PLEASE CONTACT THE CLERK TO PROVIDE PHONE NUMBER. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/3/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
11
JUDGE ILLSTON'S ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
