Ortiz v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
| Roberto Ortiz |
| Gate Gourmet, Inc. and Chris Novak |
| 4:2012cv06455 |
| December 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Mateo |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 48 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Gate Gourmet, Inc. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/23/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
46
AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER FOR BENCH TRIAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/4/13. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION (MODIFIED) filed by Chris Novak, Gate Gourmet, Inc., Roberto Ortiz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/17/13. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2013)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DISCHARGING 12 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/2/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: Plaintiff's failure to attend the Case Management Conference on 3/26/13. Show Cause Response due by 4/2/2013.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/26/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
