Depuy Synthes Products, LLC v. Spinal Kinetics, Inc.

Defendant: Spinal Kinetics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Depuy Synthes Products, LLC
Case Number: 4:2013cv00875
Filed: February 26, 2013
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Referring Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Presiding Judge: Ronald M. Whyte
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 17, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER [ 20 Lifting Stay and Dismissing Action. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/17/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Depuy Synthes Products, LLC v. Spinal Kinetics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spinal Kinetics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Depuy Synthes Products, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey Martin Olson
Represented By: Matthew Spencer Jorgenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.