Global Community Monitor v. McWane, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Global Community Monitor
Defendant:
McWane, Inc.
Case Number:
4:2013cv02014
Filed:
May 1, 2013
Court:
California Northern District Court
Office:
Oakland Office
County:
Contra Costa
Presiding Judge:
Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit:
Environmental Matters
Cause of Action:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 6, 2014 | 39 |
![]() |
January 8, 2014 | 36 |
![]() |
November 14, 2013 | 31 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Global Community Monitor v. McWane, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Global Community Monitor | |
Represented By: | Michael Robert Lozeau |
Represented By: | Richard Toshiyuki Drury |
Represented By: | Douglas Jonathan Chermak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: McWane, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.