Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. v. Metamining, Inc. et al
| Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. |
| Ling Li, Ouro Mining, Inc., Metamining, Inc. and Song Qiang Chen |
| 4:2013cv02658 |
| June 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Outside US |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER RELEASING SECURITY re 104 Order filed by Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/19/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER re 100 Order for release of security filed by Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 66 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 78 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
94
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 93 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO REQUEST TO CONTINUE AUGUST 29, 2013 HEARING filed by Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 93 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO RE QUEST TO CONTINUE AUGUST 29, 2013 HEARING, 66 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 78 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; Memo of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/27/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER re 82 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion filed by Ouro Mining, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/23/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and granting 60 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Declaration (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER re Supplemental Briefing and/or Evidence. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on July 1, 2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2013)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File; denying 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time. Plaintiff's motion to reconsider shall be construed as a new or successive motion for a writ of attachment. The motion shall be heard on August 1, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
49
WRIT of Attachment issued. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 8 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a Writ of Attachment and Temporary Restraining Order (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Re Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a Writ of Attachment, Temporary Restraining Order, and Preliminary Injunctive Relief. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/12/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 3 Motion to Seal Case (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
