Burns et al v. River View Construction, Inc.
| Heavy and Highway Committee, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health and Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Pre Apprenticeship, Apprentice and Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Richard Piombo, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Russell E. Burns and Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO |
| River View Construction, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv04729 |
| October 10, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER of DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,, filed by Richard Piombo, Heavy and Highway Committee, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Pre Apprentices hip, Apprentice and Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Russell E. Burns, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health and Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/6/13. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
