U.A. Local No. 467 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Peninsula Air Conditioning, Inc.
| U.A. Local No. 467 Vacation Trust Fund, Pipe Trades Apprentice and Journeymen Training Trust Fund for San Mateo County, U.A. Local No. 467 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, U.A. Local No. 467 Pension Trust Fund and Mike Swanson |
| Peninsula Air Conditioning, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv05522 |
| November 27, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Mateo |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE 12 MOTION for Default Judgment. Motion Hearing continued to 12/4/2014 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/31/2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISCHARGING 6 Order to Show Cause. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 11/4/2014 at 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 08/05/2014. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 7/25/2014. Case Management Statement due by 8/26/2014. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 9/2/2014 at 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 07/11/2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
