Riggs v. Grounds et al
Isaac Riggs |
R.T.C. Grounds, D. Asuncion, R. Parin, J. Stevenson and L. Cahlunder |
4:2013cv05864 |
December 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Monterey |
PSLC RMH |
Kandis A. Westmore |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 104 Stipulation. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/11/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/18/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/10/17. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2017) |
Filing 92 Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case did not settle. Parties continue settlement discussions. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/6/2016. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2016) |
Filing 81 ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; DENYING 78 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Isaac Riggs, DENYING 79 MOTION Requesting Rescheduling of Settlement Conference filed by Isaac Riggs. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/17/16. (Certificate of Service Attached) (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016) |
Filing 67 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 56 Motion to Compel. (CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED) (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015) Modified on 9/18/2015 (napS, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.