UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sprint Communications, Inc. et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Sprint Communications, Inc. and Sprint PCS
Case Number: 4:2014cv00962
Filed: March 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/4/2014. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)
March 3, 2014 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Sprint Communications, Inc., Sprint PCS. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
March 3, 2014 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/27/2014. Case Management Conference set for 6/3/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
March 3, 2014 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
March 3, 2014 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Saltiel, Steven) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
March 3, 2014 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . (Saltiel, Steven) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
March 3, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Sprint Communications, Inc., Sprint PCS. Fee waived. Filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Saltiel, Steven) (Filed on 3/3/2014) Modified on 3/3/2014 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sprint Communications, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Steven J. Saltiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Communications, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua A. Reiten
Represented By: David Francis Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint PCS
Represented By: Joshua A. Reiten
Represented By: David Francis Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?