Flaum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Morris Flaum
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Sutter Health Long Term Disability Plan
Case Number: 4:2014cv02507
Filed: May 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Morris Flaum, Motions terminated: 32 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment (Moot). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/26/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2015)
June 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER re 58 Proposed Order to submit stipulation for dismissal by 6/22/15 filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Sutter Health Long Term Disability Plan. CMC remains set for 7/2/15 and will be vacated once the Stipulation for Dismissal is filed. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/3/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2015)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 6/25/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/2/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/12/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2015)
February 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER Re Surreply. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/5/2015. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2015)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Stipulation to Continue Mediation Completion Date by 4/29/15 filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/20/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2015)
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/9/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2014)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/1/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flaum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Gail E. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sutter Health Long Term Disability Plan
Represented By: Gail E. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morris Flaum
Represented By: Teresa Renaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?