Atkinson v. Urban Land Preservation, LLC et al
Gregory Atkinson |
Urban Land Preservation, LLC, Cowan-Newton, LLC, John Rowell and John Marren |
3:2015cv03689 |
August 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 48 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2016) |
Filing 46 ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' LETTER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 44 Letter filed by Gregory Atkinson, 43 Letter filed by Urban Land Preservation, LLC. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/25/2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016) |
Filing 33 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/11/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2015) |
Filing 27 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 11 Motion to Remand (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2015) |
Filing 22 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF DIVERSITY JURISDICTION Show Cause Response due by 11/3/2015. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/28/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2015) |
Filing 9 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/26/15. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.