Judy Ditchey v. Mechanics Bank et al
| Judy Ditchey |
| Mechanics Bank and Mechanics Bank Change In Control Plan |
| 4:2015cv04103 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 49 Substitution of Counsel filed by Mechanics Bank Change In Control Plan, Mechanics Bank. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/4/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE re: 22 30 : IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall produce relevant documents, including Change in Control Agreements for other key executives by 1/15/2016; Plaintiff shall file her Supplemental Brief by 1/25/2016; Defendants shall file their Response by 2/8/2016; and Plaintiff shall file her Reply by 2/15/2016. Signed by Judge Jacqueline S. Corley on 1/14/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2016)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 19 Motion to Dismiss (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
