Joe Hemp's First Hemp Bank and Distribution Network et al v. City Of Oakland et al
Joe Hemp's First Hemp Bank and Distribution Network and David Clancy |
City Of Oakland and Gregory Minor |
4:2015cv05053 |
November 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
William Alsup |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 NOTICE RE OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ATTORNEYS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/26/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016) |
Filing 28 ORDER RE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION by Hon. William Alsup granting 27 (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015) |
Filing 26 REQUEST FOR RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/29/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015) |
Filing 21 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 20 Clerk's Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/26/15. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015) |
Filing 16 ORDER DENYING ALL PROVISIONAL RELIEF by Hon. William Alsup denying 6 Motion for TRO.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2015) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re 6 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Responses due by 11/18/2015. Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2015 01:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/16/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.