Huweih v. US Bank Trust, N.A. As Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust et al
| Amal Huweih |
| US Bank Trust, N.A. As Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust, Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and Summit Management Company, LLC |
| 4:2016cv00421 |
| January 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXPUNGE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ACTION AND FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES. The Notice of Pendency of Action recorded December 21, 2015, in the Alameda County Recorder's office as instrument no. 2015332629 is ordered expunged. Defendants are awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $1050. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/31/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND. Should plaintiff wish to file an amended pleading, her First Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than February 17, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/30/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2017)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXPUNGE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/20/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2017)
|
|
Filing
37
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/12/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/15/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2016)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/4/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Initial Case Management Conference is continued to September 9, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 10, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2016)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 12, 2016; DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 5, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2016)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The request for a continuance is granted, and the Case Management Conference is continued to July 8, 2016. An updated Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than July 1, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 2, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE; SUSPENDING BRIEFING AND VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. In light of the reference, the briefing schedule on defendant's motion to dismiss, filed February 1, 2016, is suspended, and the March 11, 2016 hearing date on said motion is vacated, pending further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 11, 2016. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
