Hardeman v. Monsanto Company et al
| Edward Hardeman |
| Monsanto Company |
| 4:2016cv00525 |
| February 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Sonoma |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
360
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 173: CORRECTION TO PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 172. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 8/13/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2019)
|
|
Filing
357
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 172: DENYING PENDING MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 8/8/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
|
|
Filing
354
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 163: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/17/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2019)
|
|
Filing
353
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 160: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MONSANTO'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES; DENYING MONSANTO'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL ON COMPENSATORY DAMAGES. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/15/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2019)
|
|
Filing
352
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 159: DENYING MONSANTO'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL ON NON-DAMAGES GROUNDS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on July 12, 2019. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019)
|
|
Filing
309
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 146: ORDER RE FURTHER SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/21/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2019)
|
|
Filing
305
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 144: ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO FORM OF JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/3/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2019)
|
|
Filing
283
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 139: FINAL PHASE 2 INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on March 26, 2019. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2019)
|
|
Filing
277
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 135: COURT'S REVISED PHASE 2 INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on March 25, 2019. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019)
|
|
Filing
260
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 127: COURT'S DRAFT PHASE 2 INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on March 24, 2019. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2019)
|
|
Filing
214
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 116: ORDER RE DESIGN DEFECT CLAIM. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/18/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019)
|
|
Filing
198
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 113: ORDER DENYING MONSANTO'S MOTION FOR A DIRECTED VERDICT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/13/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2019)
|
|
Filing
191
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 108: FINAL PHASE 1 INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on March 12, 2019. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019)
|
|
Filing
181
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 104: SCOPE OF DR. ARBER'S TESTIMONY. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on March 7, 2019. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2019)
|
|
Filing
103
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 15: THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY AND PENDING MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Chhabria on 3/13/2017. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2017)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER REGARDING POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT OF AN INDEPENDENT EXPERT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/20/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016)
|
|
Filing
74
SCHEDULING ORDER. Dispositive and Daubert Motion Hearing set for 5/11/2017 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/24/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
