KRS Capital Partners v. United Southwest Mortgage Corporation, Inc.

Plaintiff: KRS Capital Partners
Defendant: United Southwest Mortgage Corporation, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2016cv03303
Filed: June 15, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 30, 2016 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 10 Notice (Other) filed by KRS Capital Partners; Plaintiff shall file a status report by September 30, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/30/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KRS Capital Partners v. United Southwest Mortgage Corporation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KRS Capital Partners
Represented By: Karin Patricia Beam
Represented By: Terry Scanlon Sterling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Southwest Mortgage Corporation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?