Grimes et al v. Comcast Corporation et al
| James K. Grimes and Carlos Ramos |
| Comcast Corporation and Comcast of Contra Costa County, Inc. |
| 4:2016cv04178 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nandor J. Vadas |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 56 Discovery Letter Brief.(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER RELATING TRANSFERRED CASES; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES IN RELATED CASES; DEFERRING RULING ON WHETHER STAYED CASES ARE RELATED; AND REQUIRING STATUS REPORT RE STAYED CASESJoint Case Management Statement due by 9/16/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/23/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/4/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT: Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/26/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/26/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
