Asuragen, Inc. v. Accuragen, Inc.

Plaintiff: Asuragen, Inc.
Defendant: Accuragen, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2016cv05440
Filed: September 23, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 13, 2017 43 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 40 TO CLARIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND SET SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/13/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asuragen, Inc. v. Accuragen, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Asuragen, Inc.
Represented By: Mark R. Conrad
Represented By: Jason D Jones
Represented By: Warren Metlitzky
Represented By: James D. Weinberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Accuragen, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony J Weibell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?