Sandoval v. Chipotle Services, LLC et al
Carmen Cortes Sandoval |
Chipotle Services, LLC, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Claudia Chotoj |
3:2016cv06122 |
October 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 36 Stipulation FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2017) |
Filing 35 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 34 Stipulation TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2017) |
Filing 28 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/14/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2017) |
Filing 25 Notice of Reference and ORDER re Discovery Procedures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/8/2017. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 21 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Motion to Appear by Telephone for Case Management Conference.. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2017) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.