Kosi v. Littman et al
| John A. Kosi and Diana L. Kosi |
| Michael Littman, Terry Lukas Littman, William Joseph Burgoyne, Robert Fitz-Stephens, Windeler Development Group Inc. and Bypass Trust of D and G Littman Trust |
| 4:2016cv06320 |
| November 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 76 Motion to Dismiss; granting 78 Motion to Dismiss. The court grants the defendants' motions to dismiss. The TILA claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim under Rule 12( b)(6). The claims against Michael Littman individually are dismissed with prejudice. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367; those claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Windeler defendants' motions to abstain from exercising jurisdiction, and for a more definite statement, are denied as moot. (lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2017)
|
|
Filing
75
CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 74 .STIPULATION AND ORDER re: Amended Complaint. It shall be the order of this court that the first amended complaint filed at ECF no. 69 shall be the operative complaint, including its amended caption. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 03/20/2017. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
