Matoza v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 15, 2017
ORDER ADVANCING HEARING ON DEFENDANT WARRANTY SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.The hearing on Warranty Support Services, LLC's motion to compel arbitration is advanced from S eptember 8, 2017, to August 25, 2017. The Case Management Conference is continued from August 25, 2017, to November 17, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than November 9, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 08/15/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
|June 28, 2017
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; VACATING HEARING. Plaintiff shall file his proposed First Amended Complaint no later than July 5, 2017. The hearing scheduled for July 28, 2017, is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 06/28/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2017)
|May 25, 2017
ORDER APPROVING PARTIES' STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from August 11, 2017, to August 25, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than August 18, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/25/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2017)
|May 16, 2017
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/16/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?