Valorie Winn v. Mondelez International, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Valorie Winn
Defendant: Mondelez International, Inc. and Pak 'N Save, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2017cv02524
Filed: May 3, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Referring Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valorie Winn v. Mondelez International, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valorie Winn
Represented By: Andrew Christopher Hamilton
Represented By: Gregory Weston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mondelez International, Inc.
Represented By: Christina Avedissian Aryafar
Represented By: Kenneth Kiyul Lee
Represented By: Dean N. Panos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pak 'N Save, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?