Crawford v. Kernan et al
| Christopher Lee Crawford |
| Scott Kernan, C.E. Ducart, Altvatterisa, Combs, Campbell, Bond and Olson |
| 4:2017cv03089 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Kern |
| PSLC GRC |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/30/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S RULE 56(D) MOTION; DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DENYING THEIR MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AS PREMATURE; DENYING ALL REMAINING MOTIONS AS MOOT; AND SETTING DISCOVERY AND BRIEFI NG SCHEDULES by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 42 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 45 Motion for Discovery. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2020)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 51 Plaintiff's Motion To Supplement the Amended Complaint; and Granting him a Second Extension of Time to File Opposition. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
