In Re Subpoenas to Intel Corporation
In Re Subpoenas to Intel Corporation and TQ Delta LLC |
Intel Corporation |
4:2017mc80099 |
July 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Kandis A. Westmore |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 75 5/3/18 Joint Discovery Letter Brief. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2018) |
Filing 67 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting in part and denying in part TQ Delta's 1 , 48 Motion to Compel. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2018) |
Filing 50 ORDER VACATING 12/7/17 HEARING; ORDER requiring parties to file a second joint letter by 12/14/17. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/5/2017. (kawlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2017) |
Filing 46 ORDER DENYING 40 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply In Support of Intel Corporation's Opposition to TQ Delta, LLC's Motion to Compel filed by Intel Corporation; ORDER requiring Supplemental Joint Letter by 11/22/2017; ORDER continuing the hearing on TQ Delta's 1 MOTION to Compel to 12/7/2017 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/7/2017. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017) |
Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply re 1 MOTION to Compel. Reply due by 9/8/2017. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.