Nunn et al v. State of California et al
| Gerald Nunn and Judith Nunn |
| State of California and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2018cv03862 |
| June 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Napa |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/14/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019)
|
|
Filing
69
Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting 57 Motion to Dismiss. Chase's motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Plaintiffs' claims against it are dismissed without leave to amend. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S 31 MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' 44 MOTION TO DISMISS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DENYING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S 35 MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT by Judge William H. Orrick. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response/Opposition due by 10/17/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/05/2018. (wholc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF by Judge William H. Orrick denying 8 Motion for Permanent Injunction and 10 Ex Parte Application. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
