New York Life Insurance Company v. Etin et al
New York Life Insurance Company |
Marima Epshteyn, Gennady Epshteyn, Care for Seniors, Arkady Etin, Vladimir Beloshapkin and Etin Arkady Michailovich |
3:2018cv07564 |
December 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Kandis A Westmore |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New York Life Insurance Company. Arkady Etin served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 1/28/2019) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) to Extend Time for Defendants Marina Epshteyn and Gennady Epshteyn to File a Responsive Pleading filed by New York Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 1/24/2019) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New York Life Insurance Company. Care for Seniors served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 1/17/2019) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New York Life Insurance Company. Gennady Epshteyn served on 12/22/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 1/16/2019) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New York Life Insurance Company. Marima Epshteyn served on 12/22/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 1/16/2019) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New York Life Insurance Company. Vladimir Beloshapkin served on 12/22/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 1/16/2019) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION pursuant to L.R. 6-1(a) to Extend Time for Defendants Vladimir Beloshapkin and Care for Seniors to File a Responsive Pleading filed by Vladimir Beloshapkin, Care for Seniors. (Taran, Jessica) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2018) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2018) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by New York Life Insurance Company.. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 12/26/2018) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/12/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/19/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2018) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Vladimir Beloshapkin, Care for Seniors, Gennady Epshteyn, Marima Epshteyn, Arkady Etin. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2018) |
***DIREGARD. FILED IN ERROR.***#Electronic filing error. Names of interested entities or person MUST be entered at the prompt. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #3 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by New York Life Insurance Company (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2018) Modified on 12/18/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/31/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by New York Life Insurance Company Plaintiff New York Life Insurance Company's Notice of Interested Entities or Persons (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for (1) Declaratory Judgment Re Lack of Entitlement to Long-Term Care Benefits; (2) Fraud and Deceit; and (3) Restitution against Vladimir Beloshapkin, Care for Seniors, Gennady Epshteyn, Marima Epshteyn, Arkady Etin ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12933740.). Filed byNew York Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maguire, Daniel) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.